Articles Comments

Many States of Mind » Terrorism

Photography in NYC & Terrorism – Part II

Public vs. Private
Some years ago I had been approached by security while trying to photograph the Christmas tree outside the Bloomberg Tower on 58th Street. The guard’s argument was that no professional photography was allowed at that location. I clumsily argued that I wasn’t a pro yet the fellow made references to my professional looking equipment and asked me if I thought him stupid. Well, I did but of course diplomatic me [cough, cough] didn’t argue and instead asked him what was an acceptable location for my snapping of photos. He pointed to the street as well as the sidewalk across the street. Apparently in his mind, simply being on the sidewalk outside the building with my gear was enough to warrant suspicion.

Let’s forget about the harebrained notion that I was going to obtain top secret information through the overhead windows with my wide angle lens. Hmmm, have I mentioned they were tinted glass? All I can say is that I’ve no idea what all the concern was about and since then I never gave it another thought. I merely chalked it up to a fanatical concern for building security. As if my snapping photos with a point and shoot camera would’ve made a huge difference.

You see, there appears to be a big difference between photographing within public property and photographing within and around private property, and well, in NYC there’s a heck of a lot of private property out there. Certain museums will outright ban photography whereas others will allow you to snap shots during particular hours. Stand outside any one of a number of Manhattan skyscrapers with your camera pointing straight up the side and you’re likely to be shooed away even though according to some sources sidewalks are public property. Plus it’s anybody’s guess why one office building will take the subject more seriously than another.

Let’s face it. When it comes to private property, a theater, restaurant, mall, sports facility, arena or even your place of work have and should have within their authority the right to deny anyone the ability to carry out photography. Of course deciding how such actions would affect their place of business is totally up to them to judge. Their concerns about protecting copyright issues, the privacy of others, their private corporate information or whatever else are surely justified in my opinion.

Yet despite all that’s been mentioned one can’t ignore the world which exists post 911. At what point does Paranoia become more a heightened state of fear instead of a heightened state of awareness? I’m referring not merely to those folks who in response to this city’s “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign might report me for taking photos of something which your average citizen may never consider capturing. I am also referring to when I myself feel reluctant to visit certain locations with my gear simply due to the anticipation of what such actions might result in. Have already been down that road quite a number of times myself in the months following September 11, 2001.

Even today, years beyond that fateful day folks are still very shook up and on edge. It may not be quickly evident on our faces but send a low flying 747 over Lower Manhattan and watch how panicked the folks become. Watch as they run for their lives. Watch me as I sit before my television later in the day dumbfounded beyond compare as I watch and hear about the photo-op which had been pre-planned without the slightest intention of public announcement. Watch me as I sit there both furious yet in tears since my own wounds are still fresh. Such was the case on April 27, 2009.

I mention all this since this was not the world I remember prior to 911. The world back then wasn’t filled with propaganda trying to protect us from terrorism or as some might say, trying to keep our hearts filled with fear. It’s such sorts of campaigns which are dangerous ones.

Someone once said that ‘The road to hell is paved with good intentions’.

Well, there certainly seems to be a lot of paving going on these days.

The next part in this series will be about Tripods – Part III.

Again, thank you for reading this far.

Filed under: Photography, Terrorism

Photography in NYC & Terrorism? – Part I

Photography in NYC & Terrorism? – Part I

A recent posting in Telegraph.co.uk struck a chord in this author’s mind. Actually it’s a complaint in the form of a letter from 365 of Britain’s most distinguished photographers asking for the modification of that country’s anti-terrorist legislation. Apparently they’re finding themselves harassed by authorities on the other side of the pond.The above mentioned notion of photography being likened to terrorism has been on the mind of yours truly and many other NYC photographers for some time. Yet perhaps not on the same level or is it? You see, walking around with a camera in hand isn’t the problem. The trouble lies with the use of tripods in public and private spots, and the lines drawn between the two are quite thin. But I’ll get back to that soon. I would like to approach this from various angles through this multi-part posting on the subject.

– Photography en mass –

As one might expect this city attracts quite the mass of tourists each day. Heck, the NYC Office of Tourism states that 47 million foreign and domestic visitors came to the ‘big apple’ in 2008 with tens of billions of tourist dollars being spent here. Consider the proliferation of cameras of all sorts in this world and you’ve got virtually every inch of this city being photographed at some point of every day. Quite the amazing concept if you ask me.  So the thinking of some amateur and professional photographers (including yours truly) that they would be harassed for their use of a camera might seem a bit unjustifiable. Or is it? On one side of the argument would be the huge loss in revenue from such action. Let’s also consider the ridiculousness of an idea from which no good would come. Although following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 overzealous safety precautions were at their highest levels. For awhile thereafter you’d find signs on some of our bridges stating how photography of any kind was not allowed. Actually to this day, photography of, near and within Federal buildings is not allowed either. Try pulling your camera out in Lower Manhattan’s Federal Plaza and you’re liable to be approached by security of some sort or another. Perhaps I’m now convinced that those darkly clad security officers gently cuddling automatic weapons in the streets and subways of NYC aren’t the only reason why some refer to this city as ‘Fortress New York’.

Imagine my surprise when touring through Niagara Falls earlier this year I found out that not only was I allowed to use my tripod wherever I wished, within reason, but I was welcomed to do so. Imagine the surprise of the third officer I asked. Well, surprised until I told him I was from NYC. We’ve reached a point in time when there’s a fine line between protecting our civil liberties and protecting us from terrorism. A time where living in a heightened state of paranoia is the norm. When it’s not the police stopping us (since in all my years of photographing the streets I’ve yet to be approached by a police officer) but rather every day citizens simply trying to follow the rules of their jobs, be they parks rangers, building security or others.

New York City through having experienced the greatest terrorist attack on domestic soil since Pearl Harbor and having the largest and most efficient police force in all of America is now the most secure city there is. Unfortunately that security comes at a price. All I ask is that a bit more rational thinking be employed when trying to protect us all.

As an end to this entry but not an end to this entire subject I’d like to mention the following which was reported in the Guardian.co.uk

Guardian.co.uk

Scotland Yard warns police officers over photography concerns

by Paul Lewis, Tuesday 15 December 2009

“”Scotland Yard has told police officers there is “an enormous amount of concern” about the use of anti-terror laws against people taking photographs in the street.
In a circular to all Metropolitan borough commanders, John Yates, the assistant commissioner for specialist operations, advocated a “commonsense” approach and reminded officers there were no laws to stop people photographing buildings.”"

Coming up next will be Part II – Public vs. Private

Thank you for reading this far.

Filed under: Photography, Terrorism

Terror Trial Rally Photos in Foley Square – December 5, 2009

Below are photos from the December 5 Rally in Protest of the proposed Terror Trials in NYC.
Mind you the weather was horrible with chilly temperatures, strong enough winds and plenty of rain…yet the crowd was as one in spirit.
All participants proud to be standing up for our God Given Rights to Freedom of Speech. Standing up for what is right, Standing up for the fallen, Standing up for those who simply couldn’t be there. A truly proud moment in American and New York City History to be repeated again and again in the coming days, weeks and months.

A shot looking east upon my arrival at the Rally.

Folks congregating in the area for the rally as yours truly faces east towards the court houses.

Below image shows a sign held by a fellow Patriot. It speaks for us all! Doesn’t it?

An NYPD sign which says it all.

So much rain, So many umbrellas, So much Spirit!

Umbrellas were abundant in this horrible weather.

Our guest of honor, the genius of Attorney General Eric Holder as he stumbles over his own words in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Attorney General stumbles over his own words.

Filed under: Political Correctness, Terrorism

Hitting All Time Lows — The Terror Trials

On Saturday, December 5 at Noon, thousands from near and far will descend upon Foley Square in Lower Manhattan for a rallying protest against the terror trials which are to be brought to NYC.

Bring your signs, your flags but most importantly bring yourselves as we all speak out against this total disregard for what is right.

Charles Krauthammer, our fave columnist, makes some good points about the awful idea of trying Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and the four others accused in the Sept. 11 terror attacks in NYC, merely blocks away from the WTC site.

There’ve been some who’ve made the good point that NYC is an extremely secure and safe locale for such trials. ‘and indeed it is. Trust you me and the rest of us many thousands of New Yorkers who’ve gotten our eyeful of darkly clad security in our streets and subways warmly cuddling automatic weapons in their arms. Not to mention the NYPD which happens to be the largest police force in all of America. No, alot of us aren’t as concerned about our security as we are about the travesty of affording these terrorists their day in the civilian court system. Hmmmm, if you’ve read a bit about these happenings then you might’ve come across mention of how Attorney General Eric Holder who despite his conflicts of interest, Obama (self explanatory) and perhaps even the ACLU are out to put the Intelligence Agencies of these United States under trial. Not exactly a far fetched idea considering how low Political Correctness in this nation has stuped.

Take into consideration this confrontation between Bill Oreilly’s Factor producer Dan Bank and Nina Ginsberg of the John Adams Project.

Considering the route this administration, the ACLU and other so-called responsible individuals have taken thus far it’s certainly not far-fetched to think that something else is afoot.

In the end, as has been mentioned often in blogs, interviews and more by columnists, journalists and ranking political individuals it’s highly unlikely that these terrorists will ever walk free should the trials not go as expected. But that’s not the point. The point in and of itself is that it’ll seem as if someone on high is trying to make a point of their own. What that is might be left to the imagination but then who in their right mind would’ve anticipated our own country being apologized for so often in the span of a year? Who would’ve predicted our nation heading so far down the socialist road as quickly as we have in that span of time? Who would’ve imagined our beloved homeland being sold out from beneath our very own feet?

Such is the subject of fiction novels. Such are the scripts for Hollywood.

Debra Burlingame of Keep America Safe Discusses NYC Rally Against Terror Trials

For anyone curious about what’s in the media regarding all this then click here for the results to be found on Google News.

More to come……

Filed under: Political Correctness, Terrorism