Articles Comments

Many States of Mind » Photography

Photography in NYC & Terrorism – Part II

Public vs. Private
Some years ago I had been approached by security while trying to photograph the Christmas tree outside the Bloomberg Tower on 58th Street. The guard’s argument was that no professional photography was allowed at that location. I clumsily argued that I wasn’t a pro yet the fellow made references to my professional looking equipment and asked me if I thought him stupid. Well, I did but of course diplomatic me [cough, cough] didn’t argue and instead asked him what was an acceptable location for my snapping of photos. He pointed to the street as well as the sidewalk across the street. Apparently in his mind, simply being on the sidewalk outside the building with my gear was enough to warrant suspicion.

Let’s forget about the harebrained notion that I was going to obtain top secret information through the overhead windows with my wide angle lens. Hmmm, have I mentioned they were tinted glass? All I can say is that I’ve no idea what all the concern was about and since then I never gave it another thought. I merely chalked it up to a fanatical concern for building security. As if my snapping photos with a point and shoot camera would’ve made a huge difference.

You see, there appears to be a big difference between photographing within public property and photographing within and around private property, and well, in NYC there’s a heck of a lot of private property out there. Certain museums will outright ban photography whereas others will allow you to snap shots during particular hours. Stand outside any one of a number of Manhattan skyscrapers with your camera pointing straight up the side and you’re likely to be shooed away even though according to some sources sidewalks are public property. Plus it’s anybody’s guess why one office building will take the subject more seriously than another.

Let’s face it. When it comes to private property, a theater, restaurant, mall, sports facility, arena or even your place of work have and should have within their authority the right to deny anyone the ability to carry out photography. Of course deciding how such actions would affect their place of business is totally up to them to judge. Their concerns about protecting copyright issues, the privacy of others, their private corporate information or whatever else are surely justified in my opinion.

Yet despite all that’s been mentioned one can’t ignore the world which exists post 911. At what point does Paranoia become more a heightened state of fear instead of a heightened state of awareness? I’m referring not merely to those folks who in response to this city’s “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign might report me for taking photos of something which your average citizen may never consider capturing. I am also referring to when I myself feel reluctant to visit certain locations with my gear simply due to the anticipation of what such actions might result in. Have already been down that road quite a number of times myself in the months following September 11, 2001.

Even today, years beyond that fateful day folks are still very shook up and on edge. It may not be quickly evident on our faces but send a low flying 747 over Lower Manhattan and watch how panicked the folks become. Watch as they run for their lives. Watch me as I sit before my television later in the day dumbfounded beyond compare as I watch and hear about the photo-op which had been pre-planned without the slightest intention of public announcement. Watch me as I sit there both furious yet in tears since my own wounds are still fresh. Such was the case on April 27, 2009.

I mention all this since this was not the world I remember prior to 911. The world back then wasn’t filled with propaganda trying to protect us from terrorism or as some might say, trying to keep our hearts filled with fear. It’s such sorts of campaigns which are dangerous ones.

Someone once said that ‘The road to hell is paved with good intentions’.

Well, there certainly seems to be a lot of paving going on these days.

The next part in this series will be about Tripods – Part III.

Again, thank you for reading this far.

Filed under: Photography, Terrorism

Photography in NYC & Terrorism? – Part I

Photography in NYC & Terrorism? – Part I

A recent posting in Telegraph.co.uk struck a chord in this author’s mind. Actually it’s a complaint in the form of a letter from 365 of Britain’s most distinguished photographers asking for the modification of that country’s anti-terrorist legislation. Apparently they’re finding themselves harassed by authorities on the other side of the pond.The above mentioned notion of photography being likened to terrorism has been on the mind of yours truly and many other NYC photographers for some time. Yet perhaps not on the same level or is it? You see, walking around with a camera in hand isn’t the problem. The trouble lies with the use of tripods in public and private spots, and the lines drawn between the two are quite thin. But I’ll get back to that soon. I would like to approach this from various angles through this multi-part posting on the subject.

– Photography en mass –

As one might expect this city attracts quite the mass of tourists each day. Heck, the NYC Office of Tourism states that 47 million foreign and domestic visitors came to the ‘big apple’ in 2008 with tens of billions of tourist dollars being spent here. Consider the proliferation of cameras of all sorts in this world and you’ve got virtually every inch of this city being photographed at some point of every day. Quite the amazing concept if you ask me.  So the thinking of some amateur and professional photographers (including yours truly) that they would be harassed for their use of a camera might seem a bit unjustifiable. Or is it? On one side of the argument would be the huge loss in revenue from such action. Let’s also consider the ridiculousness of an idea from which no good would come. Although following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 overzealous safety precautions were at their highest levels. For awhile thereafter you’d find signs on some of our bridges stating how photography of any kind was not allowed. Actually to this day, photography of, near and within Federal buildings is not allowed either. Try pulling your camera out in Lower Manhattan’s Federal Plaza and you’re liable to be approached by security of some sort or another. Perhaps I’m now convinced that those darkly clad security officers gently cuddling automatic weapons in the streets and subways of NYC aren’t the only reason why some refer to this city as ‘Fortress New York’.

Imagine my surprise when touring through Niagara Falls earlier this year I found out that not only was I allowed to use my tripod wherever I wished, within reason, but I was welcomed to do so. Imagine the surprise of the third officer I asked. Well, surprised until I told him I was from NYC. We’ve reached a point in time when there’s a fine line between protecting our civil liberties and protecting us from terrorism. A time where living in a heightened state of paranoia is the norm. When it’s not the police stopping us (since in all my years of photographing the streets I’ve yet to be approached by a police officer) but rather every day citizens simply trying to follow the rules of their jobs, be they parks rangers, building security or others.

New York City through having experienced the greatest terrorist attack on domestic soil since Pearl Harbor and having the largest and most efficient police force in all of America is now the most secure city there is. Unfortunately that security comes at a price. All I ask is that a bit more rational thinking be employed when trying to protect us all.

As an end to this entry but not an end to this entire subject I’d like to mention the following which was reported in the Guardian.co.uk

Guardian.co.uk

Scotland Yard warns police officers over photography concerns

by Paul Lewis, Tuesday 15 December 2009

“”Scotland Yard has told police officers there is “an enormous amount of concern” about the use of anti-terror laws against people taking photographs in the street.
In a circular to all Metropolitan borough commanders, John Yates, the assistant commissioner for specialist operations, advocated a “commonsense” approach and reminded officers there were no laws to stop people photographing buildings.”"

Coming up next will be Part II – Public vs. Private

Thank you for reading this far.

Filed under: Photography, Terrorism

Bangin’ the Gavel at the New York Stock Exchange

Here’s a photo featuring Billy Ray Cyrus, Kate Voegele and Kym Johnson amongst other stars at the NYSE during the Closing Bell. Gotta say, Mr. Cyrus went bang happy with that gavel. LOL. Gotta love that sense of humor. Meanwhile outside folks were still celebrating the 2009 Wall Street Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremonies which you can read more about right here….

Filed under: Holidays, NYC Events, Photography

Wall Street / NYSE Christmas Tree Lighting

Today on December 10, 3:00 pm began what yours truly can only recall as being one of the best outdoor Christmas celebrations to have been experienced in the streets of New York City in a very long time. To some it might sound like I’m laying it on a bit thick but believe you me when I tell you how much I enjoyed the experience. Just as last year the performances were all top notch. What with such names as Billy Ray Cyrus, Joshua Bell, the Manhattan Transfer, Kate Vogele, David Nail, the Monsignor Donovan Choir amongst others belting out great tunes with gorgeous voices to boot..wellllll, heck. One simply couldn’t go wrong!

Updated is this newly added video. Sorry the quality isn’t as great as one would wish.

In the photo below…who would’ve thought Santa’s Helpers could be so beautiful?

I could sit here trying to compare them all through the wonderful memories I’ve had of this day and attempt to tell you which ones were on their game and such. But I won’t! Not for a minute. Since when i say they were all wonderful, I mean it!

Hey! Not only that but a number of us got to venture into the New York Stock Exchange itself for the closing bell for which Billy Ray Cyrus and some fellow rockers took part. Afterwards we were brought outside so’s to continue the festivities. ‘and of course there was the tree lighting. Hmmmm, may I say this year’s tree was so awesome compared to previous years’ trees? hehe, I really can remember last year’s and the one before that drooping a bit. Wellll, Perky is in and Droop is out. Wait! I can recall saying the same thing about the Rockefeller Tree once. LOL. No matter, if you should find yourself in the area of Wall Street and Broad Street (where the NYSE is located) then I’d highly suggest your passing through to get a look at this year’s grand Wall Street Christmas Tree. You won’t regret it!!! Soooo, Happy Holidays to one and all. ‘and please take a look at the display of photos below….

Be well.

Filed under: Holidays, NYC Events, Photography